State ex rel. Haeussler v. Court of Appeals

67 Mo. 199
CourtSupreme Court of Missouri
DecidedOctober 15, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by30 cases

This text of 67 Mo. 199 (State ex rel. Haeussler v. Court of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Haeussler v. Court of Appeals, 67 Mo. 199 (Mo. 1877).

Opinion

Houeií, J.

On the 23rd day of March, 1876, the relator filed a petition in the circuit court of St. Louis county, to enjoin a sale under execution of certain real estate in St. Louis, upon the ground that such sale would cast a cloud upon his title. A perpetual injunction was decreed by the circuit court, and on appeal to the Court of Appeals the judgment of the circuit court was reversed, and the'cause remanded. Thereupon the relator applied for an appeal to this court, and the Court of Appeals refused to allow the same. The relator now asks that a writ of mandamus be issued by this court compelling the Court of Appeals to grant him an appeal. ITis application is founded upon that provision of the constitution, which declares that appeals shall lie from the decisions of the Court of Appeals to this court, in all cases involving the title to real estate. The suit for injunction prosecuted by the relator is not one involving the title to real estate, within the meaning of the constitution. The result of the litigation may affect the title to real property, as would every suit in which a judgment could be rendered which would be a lien on real éstate, but it cannot be said to involve the title.

.. At the January term, 1876, at St. Louis, we decided that suits on special tax bills, and to foreclose mortgages, and to enforce mechanics liens, were not suits involving [201]*201title to real estate, and all such cases involving sums within the final jurisdiction of the Court of Appeals which were docketed in this court after the establishment of that court, were transferred to it. The real matters which the relator seeks to have determined in the suit for injunction, are the validity and efiect of the proceedings under which the execution sale is threatened to be made. He has, as yet, no contest with any one about the title to his property. The writ will be denied.

All concur.

Writ Denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ballenger v. Windes
93 S.W.2d 888 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1936)
Stumpe v. City of Washington
43 S.W.2d 414 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1931)
King v. Hayes
4 S.W.2d 1062 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1928)
Nettleton Bank v. Estate of McGauhey
2 S.W.2d 771 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1928)
Dubowsky v. Binggeli
167 S.W. 999 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1914)
City of Kirkwood ex rel. McMahon v. Handlan
168 S.W. 346 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1914)
Vandeventer v. Florida Savings Bank
135 S.W. 23 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1911)
Loewenstein v. Queen Insurance
127 S.W. 72 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
State ex rel. Gavin v. Muench
124 S.W. 1124 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1910)
Payne v. Daviess County Savings Ass'n
105 S.W. 15 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1907)
Payne v. Daviess County Savings Ass'n
96 S.W. 1016 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
Barnes v. Stone
95 S.W. 915 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1906)
State ex rel. Reed v. Elliott
79 S.W. 696 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
State ex rel. South Missouri Pine Lumber Co. v. Dearing
79 S.W. 454 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1904)
Balz v. Nelson
72 S.W. 527 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
Klingelhoefer v. Smith
71 S.W. 1008 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1903)
F. M. Bruner Granitoid Co. v. Klein
70 S.W. 687 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1902)
Vandergrif v. Brock
59 S.W. 979 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1900)
Force v. Van Patton
50 S.W. 906 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1899)
Price v. Blankenship
45 S.W. 1123 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1898)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 Mo. 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-haeussler-v-court-of-appeals-mo-1877.