State ex rel. Hadley v. Adkins

Missouri Court of Appeals

State ex rel. Hadley v. Adkins

100 S.W. 661, 119 Mo. App. 396, 1906 Mo. App. LEXIS 245

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 8, 1906

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 100 S.W. 661 (State ex rel. Hadley v. Adkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Hadley v. Adkins, 100 S.W. 661, 119 Mo. App. 396, 1906 Mo. App. LEXIS 245 (Mo. Ct. App. 1906).

Pincite

Opinion

BLAND, P. J.

On the petition of the attorney-general, the circuit court of McDonald county issued its writ of certiorari commanding the defendants, justices of the county court of said county, to make return to the writ and sIioay by what authority they, as justices of said county court, had sélected and appointed the State Bank of Anderson, in said county, as the depository of the public funds of said county. In obedience to the command of the writ, defendants made their return, incorporating therein a duly authenticated copy of the proceedings of the McDonald County Court, resulting in the selection and appointment of the State Bank of Anderson as the depository of the public founds of the county, except the capital public school fund. On the hearing the proceedings of the county court were quashed by the circuit court, from which judgment defendants duly appealed.

[397]*397It seems to us the case involves the construction of the revenue laws of the State. If so, this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal (section 12, article 6, Constitution); therefore, the case is transferred to the Supreme Court.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLAND, P. J.

On the petition of the attorney-general, the circuit court of McDonald county issued its writ of certiorari commanding the defendants, justices of the county court of said county, to make return to the writ and sIioay by what authority they, as justices of said county court, had sélected and appointed the State Bank of Anderson, in said county, as the depository of the public funds of said county. In obedience to the command of the writ, defendants made their return, incorporating therein a duly authenticated copy of the proceedings of the McDonald County Court, resulting in the selection and appointment of the State Bank of Anderson as the depository of the public founds of the county, except the capital public school fund. On the hearing the proceedings of the county court were quashed by the circuit court, from which judgment defendants duly appealed.

[397]*397It seems to us the case involves the construction of the revenue laws of the State. If so, this court is without jurisdiction to hear and determine the appeal (section 12, article 6, Constitution); therefore, the case is transferred to the Supreme Court.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

100 S.W. 661, 119 Mo. App. 396, 1906 Mo. App. LEXIS 245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hadley-v-adkins-moctapp-1906.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack