State Ex Rel. Hackett v. Russo, 89385 (5-4-2007)
This text of 2007 Ohio 2235 (State Ex Rel. Hackett v. Russo, 89385 (5-4-2007)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} Hackett appealed his conviction and sentence and this court reversed in part and remanded the case for resentencing. State v.Hackett, Cuyahoga App. No. 83810,
{¶ 3} Hackett requests that this court issue a writ of mandamus compelling respondent judge to issue an order requiring that Hackett be returned to *Page 2 Cuyahoga County for resentencing. Respondent has, however, filed a motion for summary judgment attached to which is a copy of a journal entry received for filing on February 27, 2007 in Case No. CR-410750 in which respondent ordered Hackett returned to Cuyahoga County Jail for resentencing. As a consequence, this action is moot.
{¶ 4} Accordingly, respondent's motion for summary judgment is granted. Respondent to pay costs. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ. R. 58(B).
Writ denied.
*Page 1ANTHONY O. CALABRESE, JR., J. and MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J. CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2007 Ohio 2235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-hackett-v-russo-89385-5-4-2007-ohioctapp-2007.