Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State ex rel. Guterma v. Douglas

State ex rel. Guterma v. Douglas

463 So. 2d 538, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12404
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 13, 1985
DocketCase No. 84-2702
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 463 So. 2d 538 (State ex rel. Guterma v. Douglas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Guterma v. Douglas, 463 So. 2d 538, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Prohibition does not lie. English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977). We consider the petition as one for certiorari relief, 9.040(c) Fla.R.App.P. and deny the petition for failure to demonstrate the lack of an adequate remedy by appeal. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Graham, 404 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), petition for review denied, 419 So.2d 1195, 1201 (Fla.1982). Nor is an order appointing a receiver appealable pursuant to Rule 9.130(a)(3).

PETITION DENIED.

HERSEY, DELL and WALDEN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fla. Reinvestment Corp. v. Cypress Sav.
509 So. 2d 1352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 So. 2d 538, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12404, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-guterma-v-douglas-fladistctapp-1985.