State ex rel. Guterma v. Douglas
463 So. 2d 538, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12404
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 13, 1985·No. Case No. 84-2702·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Prohibition does not lie. English v. McCrary, 348 So.2d 293 (Fla.1977). We consider the petition as one for certiorari relief, 9.040(c) Fla.R.App.P. and deny the petition for failure to demonstrate the lack of an adequate remedy by appeal. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Graham, 404 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 1981), petition for review denied, 419 So.2d 1195, 1201 (Fla.1982). Nor is an order appointing a receiver appealable pursuant to Rule 9.130(a)(3).
PETITION DENIED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Guterma v. Douglas, 463 So. 2d 538, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 388, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 12404 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).
463 So. 2d 538 (State ex rel. Guterma v. Douglas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fla. Reinvestment Corp. v. Cypress Sav.
509 So. 2d 1352 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)