State ex rel. Guste v. Texaco Inc.

453 So. 2d 557, 1984 La. LEXIS 8836
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedApril 11, 1984
DocketNos. 83-C-1743, 83-C-1756
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 453 So. 2d 557 (State ex rel. Guste v. Texaco Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Guste v. Texaco Inc., 453 So. 2d 557, 1984 La. LEXIS 8836 (La. 1984).

Opinion

JOINT MOTION AND ORDER FOR DISMISSAL AND RELEASE OF FUNDS DEPOSITED IN THE REGISTRY OF THE COURT

DIXON, Chief Justice.

On motion of BROADHURST, BROOK, MANGHAM, HARDY & REED, Relator-Appellant, through Peter J. Butler, counsel for Relator-Appellant; ERNEST R. EL-DRED, P.L.C., Relator-Appellant, through Ernest R. Eldred, appearing in proper person; STATE OF LOUISIANA, Intervenor-Appellee, appearing through its Governor, the Honorable Edwin W. Edwards and its Attorney-General, William J. Guste, Jr.; LOUISIANA STATE MINERAL BOARD, Appellee, appearing through its Chairman, T.W. “Tom” McKinney, pursuant to Mineral Board Resolution dated April 10, 1984; THE DIVISION OF ADMINISTRATION, Intervenor-Appellee, appearing through its Commissioner, Stephanie Alexander; THE [558]*558LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, appearing through William C. Huís, Secretary of the Department; and on suggesting to this Honorable Court that this matter has been settled to the satisfaction of all the parties involved, and that Relator-Appellants’ appeal and the intervention should be dismissed, with prejudice, at Relator-Appellants’ cost; and

On further suggesting to this Honorable Court that the $873,000.00 deposited in the Registry of the 16th Judicial District Court, Parish of St. Mary, State of Louisiana, and the interest which has accrued thereon, should be immediately paid to Broadhurst, Brook, Mangham, Hardy & Reed and Ernest R. Eldred, P.L.C., jointly, in accordance with the “Ancillary Judgment Fixing and Awarding Attorneys’ Fees” rendered and signed on December 10, 1981, by the 16th Judicial District Court in the matter entitled “State of Louisiana, Ex Rel William J. Guste, Jr., Et A1 versus Texaco Inc., Et Al” bearing Docket No. 60,407 on the docket of the District Court for the Parish of St. Mary, Louisiana:

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this appeal and the intervention be and the same is hereby dismissed, with prejudice, and that the District Court Judge for the 16th Judicial District Court in the Parish of St. Mary, State of Louisiana, order the State Treasurer and the Clerk of said Court to immediately pay to Broadhurst, Brook, Mangham, Hardy & Reed and Ernest R. Eldred, P.L.C., the sum of $873,000.00 previously ordered to be paid by Texaco Inc. to Broadhurst, Brook, Mangham, Hardy & Reed and Ernest R. Eldred, P.L.C., and the interest which has accrued thereon.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Unisys Corp. v. La. Office of Motor Vehicles
270 So. 3d 637 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2018)
United States v. Louisiana
751 F. Supp. 608 (E.D. Louisiana, 1990)
United States v. State of La.
751 F. Supp. 608 (E.D. Louisiana, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
453 So. 2d 557, 1984 La. LEXIS 8836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-guste-v-texaco-inc-la-1984.