State ex rel. Gund Co. v. Village of Solon

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Gund Co. v. Village of Solon

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 318

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedNovember 23, 1960

DocketNo. 36464

StatusPublished

This text of 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 318 (State ex rel. Gund Co. v. Village of Solon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Gund Co. v. Village of Solon, 171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 318 (Ohio 1960).

Pincite

Opinions

Per Curiam.

Chapter 2506, Bevised Code, provides a remedy by judicial review of final orders of administrative boards of municipalities. Belator had an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal to test the claimed invalidity of the zoning ordinance.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained and, it being agreed that such a ruling on the demurrer would be dispositive of the case, the writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

Wevgandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Chapter 2506, Bevised Code, provides a remedy by judicial review of final orders of administrative boards of municipalities. Belator had an adequate remedy at law by way of appeal to test the claimed invalidity of the zoning ordinance.

The demurrer to the petition is sustained and, it being agreed that such a ruling on the demurrer would be dispositive of the case, the writ of mandamus is denied.

Writ denied.

Wevgandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 Ohio St. (N.S.) 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gund-co-v-village-of-solon-ohio-1960.