State ex rel. Grumman Ohio Corp. v. Indus. Comm.
Opinion
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 358.]
THE STATE EX REL. GRUMMAN OHIO CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Grumman Ohio Corp. v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-80.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-1471—Submitted August 19, 1998—Decided October 14, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD05-674. __________________ Porter, Wright, Morris & Arthur, Darrell R. Shepard and Christopher C. Russell, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Craigg E. Gould, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Word, Kaps, Bainbridge, Maurer & Melvin and William J. Melvin, for appellee Minia Baughman. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., DOUGLAS, RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents. __________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
1998 Ohio 80 (State ex rel. Grumman Ohio Corp. v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.