State ex rel. Grippen v. State

Court of Appeals of Mississippi

State ex rel. Grippen v. State

17 So. 3d 952, 2009 La. LEXIS 2525, 2009 WL 3248306

Court of Appeals of Mississippi·Decided September 4, 2009·No. No. 2008-KH-1975·Published

Opinion

In re Grippen, Leroy;Applying for Motion to Enforce this Court’s action dated October 3, 2008, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. K, No. 214-495.

Writ denied. The district court’s action has rendered relator’s motion for his sentencing transcript moot. As to relator’s motion for production of documents seek[953]*953ing the district attorney’s file, relator must first address his request to the records’ custodians. R.S. 44:31; State ex rel. Shelton v. State, 00-1901 (La.9/14/01), 796 So.2d 672; State ex rel. McKnight v. State, 98-2258 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/3/98), 742 So.2d 894.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Grippen, Leroy;Applying for Motion to Enforce this Court’s action dated October 3, 2008, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. K, No. 214-495.

Writ denied. The district court’s action has rendered relator’s motion for his sentencing transcript moot. As to relator’s motion for production of documents seek[953]*953ing the district attorney’s file, relator must first address his request to the records’ custodians. R.S. 44:31; State ex rel. Shelton v. State, 00-1901 (La.9/14/01), 796 So.2d 672; State ex rel. McKnight v. State, 98-2258 (La.App. 1st Cir.12/3/98), 742 So.2d 894.

State ex rel. Grippen v. State, 17 So. 3d 952, 2009 La. LEXIS 2525, 2009 WL 3248306 (Mich. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

17 So. 3d 952 (State ex rel. Grippen v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related