State Ex Rel. Grim v. Juvenal

159 So. 665, 118 Fla. 485, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1742
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 25, 1935
DocketA.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 159 So. 665 (State Ex Rel. Grim v. Juvenal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State Ex Rel. Grim v. Juvenal, 159 So. 665, 118 Fla. 485, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1742 (Fla. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an original proceeding in mandamus. The command of the alternative writ is that the respondents, as members of the Board of County Commissioners of Broward County convene and approve the salary bill of relator, and do all things necessary to pay the compensation due relator as the duly commissioned and qualified Probation officer of Broward County, Florida, under Section 3690 C. G. L., 2325 R. G. S., for the period from June, 1933, to October, 1934, amounting to $1,275.00, and that the respondent, J. H. Juvenal, as Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, and the respondent, E. R. Bennett, as Clerk of said Board, draw and countersign a warrant or warrants to the relator in payment of his salary claim aforesaid. The command of the wxdt extends “to all subsequent bills for salary” and is addressed not only to the respondents, but to their successors in office as well.

To the extent that the command of the writ extends to “all subsequent bills for salary” and to the extent that it runs to the successors in office of respondents the writ is too broad and the motion to quash interposed thereto is well taken and should be sustained. State, ex rel. Ben Hur Life Insurance Assn. v. Vickers, 115 Fla. 561, 156 Sou. Rep. 19.

It is therefore ordered that the alternative writ of mandamus herein be quashed with leave to amend in conformity *487 with this opinion within ten days, respondents to have a like period for further motion, answer or reply to the alternative writ as amended.

Alternative writ quashed with leave to amend.

Whitfield, C. J., and Ellis, Terrell, Brown, Buford and Davis, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Ship Canal Authority v. Lancaster
170 So. 126 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1936)
State Ex Rel. Crim v. Juvenal
163 So. 569 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
159 So. 665, 118 Fla. 485, 1935 Fla. LEXIS 1742, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-grim-v-juvenal-fla-1935.