Home/Washington Supreme Court/State ex rel. Griffith v. Superior Court

State ex rel. Griffith v. Superior Court

169 P. 317, 99 Wash. 693, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 1178
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1917
DocketNo. 13981
StatusPublished

This text of 169 P. 317 (State ex rel. Griffith v. Superior Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Griffith v. Superior Court, 169 P. 317, 99 Wash. 693, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 1178 (Wash. 1917).

Opinion

On Rehearing.

Per Curiam.

Upon a rehearing En Banc, a majority of the court still adhere to the opinion heretofore filed herein as reported in 96 Wash. 41, 164 Pae. 516. For the reasons therein stated, the respondent superior judge is directed to enter an order transferring the case of Alki Investment Company v. Charles Griffith to the superior court of Pacific county for further proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Superior Court
96 Wash. 41 (Washington Supreme Court, 1917)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 P. 317, 99 Wash. 693, 1917 Wash. LEXIS 1178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-griffith-v-superior-court-wash-1917.