State ex rel. Griffith v. Conner

Supreme Court of Kansas

State ex rel. Griffith v. Conner

237 P. 385, 119 Kan. 279, 1925 Kan. LEXIS 446

CourtSupreme Court of Kansas

DecidedJuly 11, 1925

DocketNo. 26,133

StatusPublished

This text of 237 P. 385 (State ex rel. Griffith v. Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Griffith v. Conner, 237 P. 385, 119 Kan. 279, 1925 Kan. LEXIS 446 (kan 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

The decision of the court was announced by

Dawson, J.:

Where women and girls affected with venereal disease are sent from Sedgwick county to the Kansas state quarantine hospital for women, pursuant to orders of isolation duly issued by the local health authority, Sedgwick county is liable for the actual, necessary and reasonable expenses of such women and girls in returning to their homes in Sedgwick county when they are discharged from such quarantine hospital; and the board of county commissioners of Sedgwick county is directed to make timely and adequate provision for the payment of such expenses in conformity with the reasonable regulations of the state authorities in charge of such state quarantine hospital concerning the reception and discharge of persons ordered to be conveyed to and isolated therein. The writ is allowed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The decision of the court was announced by

Dawson, J.:

Where women and girls affected with venereal disease are sent from Sedgwick county to the Kansas state quarantine hospital for women, pursuant to orders of isolation duly issued by the local health authority, Sedgwick county is liable for the actual, necessary and reasonable expenses of such women and girls in returning to their homes in Sedgwick county when they are discharged from such quarantine hospital; and the board of county commissioners of Sedgwick county is directed to make timely and adequate provision for the payment of such expenses in conformity with the reasonable regulations of the state authorities in charge of such state quarantine hospital concerning the reception and discharge of persons ordered to be conveyed to and isolated therein. The writ is allowed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

237 P. 385, 119 Kan. 279, 1925 Kan. LEXIS 446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-griffith-v-conner-kan-1925.