State ex rel. Griffin v. Schulz

123 So. 2d 405, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2437
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 1960·No. No. 60-181·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration ex parte of suggestion for writ of prohibition filed in the above styled matter, and petitioner’s application for issuance of a rule nisi thereon, the court finds that the suggestion fails to make a prima facie case, whereupon, the application for rule nisi is denied and the suggestion for writ of prohibition is dismissed. See Rule 4.5(d) (2), F.A.R., 31 F.S.A.

This action is taken without prejudice to any authorized procedure for review of the order o.r orders complained of.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Griffin v. Schulz, 123 So. 2d 405, 1960 Fla. App. LEXIS 2437 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

123 So. 2d 405 (State ex rel. Griffin v. Schulz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Faber v. Landman
123 So. 2d 405 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)