State ex rel. Gregory v. Masheter

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Gregory v. Masheter

208 N.E.2d 926, 3 Ohio St. 2d 43, 32 Ohio Op. 2d 24, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 441

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJune 30, 1965

DocketNo. 39282

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 208 N.E.2d 926 (State ex rel. Gregory v. Masheter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Gregory v. Masheter, 208 N.E.2d 926, 3 Ohio St. 2d 43, 32 Ohio Op. 2d 24, 1965 Ohio LEXIS 441 (Ohio 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion is well taken. The order overruling the motion to quash service of summons is not a final appealable order as defined by Section 2505.02, Eevised Code. Eespondent is not precluded by the overruling of the motion to ouash but may make a full defense in the action without waiving his objection to jurisdiction. State, ex. rel. Rhodes, Aud., v. Solether, Judge, 162 Ohio St. 559.

The issue as to . venue has been answered in the case of [44]*44State, ex rel. Barber, Pros. Atty., v. Rhodes, Aud., 165 Ohio St. 414. The ease should be brought in Franidin County against the respondent.

Appeal dismissed.

Taft, C. J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Kerns, JJ., concur. Kerns, J., of the Second Appellate District, sitting for Brown, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI