State ex rel. Greene v. Conner

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State ex rel. Greene v. Conner

190 So. 2d 12

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 13, 1966

DocketNo. I-36

StatusPublished

This text of 190 So. 2d 12 (State ex rel. Greene v. Conner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Greene v. Conner, 190 So. 2d 12 (Fla. Ct. App. 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is taken from an order granting defendant’s Motion to Quash the Petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus sought by plaintiff (appellant). Said order not being a final judgment from which an appeal will lie, this court must dismiss the appeal ex mero motu. State ex rel. Mott v. Scofield, 120 So.2d 825 (Fla.App,2d, 1960); State ex rel. Sidman v. Fink, 140 So.2d 612 (Fla.App.3d, 1962).

Dismissed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SACK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appeal is taken from an order granting defendant’s Motion to Quash the Petition for Alternative Writ of Mandamus sought by plaintiff (appellant). Said order not being a final judgment from which an appeal will lie, this court must dismiss the appeal ex mero motu. State ex rel. Mott v. Scofield, 120 So.2d 825 (Fla.App,2d, 1960); State ex rel. Sidman v. Fink, 140 So.2d 612 (Fla.App.3d, 1962).

Dismissed.

WIGGINTON, Acting C. J., and JOHNSON and SACK, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

190 So. 2d 12, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-greene-v-conner-fladistctapp-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack