State ex rel. Green v. Saffold
This text of 2014 Ohio 3242 (State ex rel. Green v. Saffold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State ex rel. Green v. Saffold, 2014-Ohio-3242.]
Court of Appeals of Ohio EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION No. 101151
STATE EX REL. ERIC D. GREEN RELATOR
vs.
JUDGE SHIRLEY S. SAFFOLD RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT: WRIT DENIED
Writ of Procedendo Motion No. 474018 Order No. 476170
RELEASE DATE: July 22, 2014 FOR RELATOR
Eric D. Green Inmate #A573-121, Grafton 2500 S. Avon Belden Road Grafton, OH 44044
ATTORNEYS FOR RESPONDENT
Timothy J. McGinty Cuyahoga County Prosecutor By: James E. Moss Assistant Prosecuting Attorney Justice Center - 9th Floor 1200 Ontario Street Cleveland, OH 44113 KENNETH A. ROCCO, P.J.:
{¶1} Relator, Eric D. Green, petitions this court to compel the respondent judge
to dispose of his motion for jail-time credit filed in State v. Green, Cuyahoga C.P. No.
CR-09-522075-A filed on October 17, 2013.
{¶2} Respondent has filed a motion for summary judgment citing numerous
procedural deficiencies in Green’s petition and also attached a copy of a journal entry
issued by respondent that granted Green’s motion for jail-time credit on April 2, 2014.
Specifically, respondent asserts that Green failed to comply with the requirements of R.C.
2969.25(C), Civ.R. 10, and Loc.App.R. 45. Respondent’s motion for summary judgment
is granted based on the procedural deficiencies in Green’s petition. Further, Green is not
entitled to a writ of procedendo because the action is moot. State ex rel. Jerninghan v.
Cuyahoga Cty. Court of Common Pleas, 74 Ohio St.3d 278, 1996-Ohio-117, 658 N.E.2d
723; State ex rel. Gantt v. Coleman, 6 Ohio St.3d 5, 450 N.E.2d 1163 (1983).
{¶3} Accordingly, respondent’s motion for summary judgment is granted. Relator
to pay costs; costs waived. The clerk is directed to serve upon the parties notice of this
judgment and its date of entry upon the journal. Civ.R. 58(B).
{¶4} Writ denied. __________________________________________ KENNETH A. ROCCO, PRESIDING JUDGE
MARY EILEEN KILBANE, J., and PATRICIA ANN BLACKMON, J., CONCUR
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2014 Ohio 3242, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-green-v-saffold-ohioctapp-2014.