State ex rel. Greeley v. Southard

61 Mo. App. 296, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 58
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 2, 1895·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Rombauer, P. J.

—This is an original proceeding by mandamus. The traverse of the respondent’s return, among other things, asserts' that a certain ordinance of the city of St. Louis relied on by respondent is unconstitutional. As the relators insist on the constitutional objection, they have necessarily pleaded themselves out of court, since, under the decision of the supreme court in State ex rel. Blakemore v. Rombauer, 101 Mo. 499, the jurisdiction of this court -in proceedings by original writ is limited to cases falling within its appellate jurisdiction.

Neither can we transfer the cause to the supreme court, as section 3300 of the Revised Statutes of 1889 confines the power of such transfer to cases which reach this court by appeal or writ of error. Hence, the only disposition which we can make of this writ is to dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. So ordered.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Greeley v. Southard, 61 Mo. App. 296, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 58 (Mo. Ct. App. 1895).

61 Mo. App. 296 (State ex rel. Greeley v. Southard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Disbarment Proceedings Against Sparrow
90 S.W.2d 401 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1935)
City of Moberly v. Lotter
181 S.W. 991 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)