State ex rel. Greeley v. Southard

61 Mo. App. 296, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 58
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 2, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 61 Mo. App. 296 (State ex rel. Greeley v. Southard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Greeley v. Southard, 61 Mo. App. 296, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 58 (Mo. Ct. App. 1895).

Opinion

Rombauer, P. J.

—This is an original proceeding by mandamus. The traverse of the respondent’s return, among other things, asserts' that a certain ordinance of the city of St. Louis relied on by respondent is unconstitutional. As the relators insist on the constitutional objection, they have necessarily pleaded themselves out of court, since, under the decision of the supreme court in State ex rel. Blakemore v. Rombauer, 101 Mo. 499, the jurisdiction of this court -in proceedings by original writ is limited to cases falling within its appellate jurisdiction.

Neither can we transfer the cause to the supreme court, as section 3300 of the Revised Statutes of 1889 confines the power of such transfer to cases which reach this court by appeal or writ of error. Hence, the only disposition which we can make of this writ is to dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. So ordered.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Disbarment Proceedings Against Sparrow
90 S.W.2d 401 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1935)
City of Moberly v. Lotter
181 S.W. 991 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
61 Mo. App. 296, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-greeley-v-southard-moctapp-1895.