State ex rel. Greeley v. Southard
This text of 61 Mo. App. 296 (State ex rel. Greeley v. Southard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—This is an original proceeding by mandamus. The traverse of the respondent’s return, among other things, asserts' that a certain ordinance of the city of St. Louis relied on by respondent is unconstitutional. As the relators insist on the constitutional objection, they have necessarily pleaded themselves out of court, since, under the decision of the supreme court in State ex rel. Blakemore v. Rombauer, 101 Mo. 499, the jurisdiction of this court -in proceedings by original writ is limited to cases falling within its appellate jurisdiction.
Neither can we transfer the cause to the supreme court, as section 3300 of the Revised Statutes of 1889 confines the power of such transfer to cases which reach this court by appeal or writ of error. Hence, the only disposition which we can make of this writ is to dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. So ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
61 Mo. App. 296, 1895 Mo. App. LEXIS 58, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-greeley-v-southard-moctapp-1895.