State ex rel. Gray v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court

162 N.E.2d 444, 240 Ind. 695, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 280
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided November 25, 1959·No. No. 0-580·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam

The petitioner asks an alternative writ of mandate against the respondent court and judge.

The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which the petition is based, to be filed with the petition in order that this court have proper proof of the allegations- made in the petition.

For the reasons stated, the petition is denied.

Achor, J., not participating because of illness.

Note. — Reported in 162 N. E. 2d 444.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Gray v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court, 162 N.E.2d 444, 240 Ind. 695, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 280 (Ind. 1959).

162 N.E.2d 444 (State ex rel. Gray v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bratton v. Dowd
162 N.E.2d 444 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1959)