State ex rel. Gray v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court

162 N.E.2d 444, 240 Ind. 695, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 280
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 25, 1959
DocketNo. 0-580
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 162 N.E.2d 444 (State ex rel. Gray v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Gray v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court, 162 N.E.2d 444, 240 Ind. 695, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 280 (Ind. 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam

The petitioner asks an alternative writ of mandate against the respondent court and judge.

The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which the petition is based, to be filed with the petition in order that this court have proper proof of the allegations- made in the petition.

For the reasons stated, the petition is denied.

Achor, J., not participating because of illness.

Note. — Reported in 162 N. E. 2d 444.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bratton v. Dowd
162 N.E.2d 444 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1959)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 N.E.2d 444, 240 Ind. 695, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gray-v-vanderburgh-circuit-court-ind-1959.