State ex rel. Gray v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court
This text of 162 N.E.2d 444 (State ex rel. Gray v. Vanderburgh Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petitioner asks an alternative writ of mandate against the respondent court and judge.
The petition does not comply with Rule 2-35 of this court which requires certified copies of the proceedings upon which the petition is based, to be filed with the petition in order that this court have proper proof of the allegations- made in the petition.
For the reasons stated, the petition is denied.
Note. — Reported in 162 N. E. 2d 444.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
162 N.E.2d 444, 240 Ind. 695, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 280, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gray-v-vanderburgh-circuit-court-ind-1959.