State ex rel. Gray v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Gray v. State

547 So. 2d 374, 1989 La. LEXIS 1884, 1989 WL 92085

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedAugust 15, 1989

DocketNo. 89-KH-1750

StatusPublished

This text of 547 So. 2d 374 (State ex rel. Gray v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Gray v. State, 547 So. 2d 374, 1989 La. LEXIS 1884, 1989 WL 92085 (La. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Gray, Albert; —Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; [375]*375Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 9-81-116.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Gray, Albert; —Plaintiff(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; [375]*375Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “D”, No. 9-81-116.

The relator represents that the district court has failed to act timely on an application he has filed for post-conviction relief. If relator’s representation is correct, the district court is ordered to consider and act on the application.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

547 So. 2d 374, 1989 La. LEXIS 1884, 1989 WL 92085, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gray-v-state-la-1989.