State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst

Supreme Court of Florida

State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst

128 So. 264, 99 Fla. 1027

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 6, 1930

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 128 So. 264 (State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst, 128 So. 264, 99 Fla. 1027 (Fla. 1930).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Petitioner by mandamus in this Court seeks to have his name restored to the roll of attorneys in good standing before the bar of this State, relying on State v. Kirk, 12 Fla. 278. At the time of State v. Kirk Sections 2554 et seq., Rev. Gen. Stats, (now Sections 4172 et seq., Comp. Gen.' Laws of 1927) was not in force. The latter statute providing a more speedy and adequate remedy, the petition for mandamus is denied.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Petitioner by mandamus in this Court seeks to have his name restored to the roll of attorneys in good standing before the bar of this State, relying on State v. Kirk, 12 Fla. 278. At the time of State v. Kirk Sections 2554 et seq., Rev. Gen. Stats, (now Sections 4172 et seq., Comp. Gen.' Laws of 1927) was not in force. The latter statute providing a more speedy and adequate remedy, the petition for mandamus is denied.

All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

128 So. 264, 99 Fla. 1027, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gravely-v-whitehurst-fla-1930.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack