State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst
128 So. 264, 99 Fla. 1027
Opinion
Petitioner by mandamus in this Court seeks to have his name restored to the roll of attorneys in good standing before the bar of this State, relying on State v. Kirk, 12 Fla. 278. At the time of State v. Kirk Sections 2554 et seq., Rev. Gen. Stats, (now Sections 4172 et seq., Comp. Gen.' Laws of 1927) was not in force. The latter statute providing a more speedy and adequate remedy, the petition for mandamus is denied.
All concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst, 128 So. 264, 99 Fla. 1027 (Fla. 1930).
128 So. 264 (State Ex Rel. Gravely v. Whitehurst) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Curcie Bros. v. Caruthers
183 So. 2d 594 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
Lewis & Holmes Motor Freight Corp. v. City of Atlanta
25 S.E.2d 699 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)