State ex rel. Graham v. Indus. Comm.

1998 Ohio 165, 83 Ohio St. 3d 97
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided September 9, 1998·No. 1996-2079·Published

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 83 Ohio St.3d 97.]

THE STATE EX REL. GRAHAM, APPELLANT, v. INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION OF OHIO, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Graham v. Indus. Comm., 1998-Ohio-165.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 96-2079—Submitted July 8, 1998—Decided September 9, 1998.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 95APD10-1334. __________________ Raymond J. Tisone & Associates Co., L.P.A., and Raymond J. Tisone, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Doug S. Musick, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, PFEIFER and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents and would order relief consistent with State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm (1994), 68 Ohio St.3d 315, 626 N.E.2d 666. F.E. SWEENEY, J., dissents. COOK, J., dissents and would deny the writ. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Graham v. Indus. Comm., 1998 Ohio 165, 83 Ohio St. 3d 97 (Ohio 1998).

1998 Ohio 165 (State ex rel. Graham v. Indus. Comm.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm
626 N.E.2d 666 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)