State ex rel. Graham v. Dean

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State ex rel. Graham v. Dean

217 So. 2d 580, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6357

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 8, 1969

DocketNo. 68-494

StatusPublished

This text of 217 So. 2d 580 (State ex rel. Graham v. Dean) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Graham v. Dean, 217 So. 2d 580, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 6357 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

MANN, Judge.

Governor Burns suspended County Judge Graham and later conferred with him and his attorney. The testimony is conflicting, but the circuit court held, on adequate evidence, that the relator’s rights to due process were not violated, so this finding must stand. See State ex rel. Kelly v. Sul[581]*581livan, 52 So.2d 422 (Fla.1951) and cases there cited.

Article III, Section 2A of our constitution, F.S.A. forbids the legislature from transacting other business at its organizational session, so the Senate did not act in November, 1966, but in January, 1967, Governor Kirk transmitted the suspension papers to the Senate when it met in an extra session, and the Senate removed Graham. Prior to that session he had not requested a hearing before the Senate or its appropriate committee.

The circuit court’s denial of quo war-ranto is supported by the record.

LILES, C. J., and HOBSON, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI