State Ex Rel. Goodwin v. Dist. Cour
This text of State Ex Rel. Goodwin v. Dist. Cour (State Ex Rel. Goodwin v. Dist. Cour) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
No, 13012
I N THE SUPREME COURT O THE STATE OF M N A A F OTN
THE STATE OF M N A A e x rel. OTN FORREST GOODWIN,
Relator,
THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE TENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE STATE OF M N A A i n and OTN f o r t h e County of F e r g u s , and t h e HONORABLE LEROY L. McKINNON, P r e s i d i n g Judge,
Respondents.
ORIGINAL PROCEEDING:
F o r Rela t o r :
S a n d a l l , Cavan and Edwards, B i l l i n g s , Montana A. C l i f f o r d Edwards argued, B i l l i n g s , Montana
F o r Respondents :
William A , Spoja, County A t t o r n e y , a r g u e d , Lewistown, Montana
Submitted: A p r i l 29, 1975
Decided : j ~ 1 2 & l5 g Filed : doh! 1 1975 J u s t i c e Gene B. Daly d e l i v e r e d t h e Opinion of t h e Court.
This i s an o r i g i n a l proceeding. R e l a t o r F o r r e s t Goodwin p e t i t i o n s f o r a w r i t of s u p e r v i s o r y c o n t r o l d i r e c t e d t o t h e d i s t r j c o u r t of t h e t e n t h j u d i c i a l d i s t r i c t , county of Fergus, and t h e Hon. LeRoy L. McKinnon, p r e s i d i n g judge. R e l a t o r a s k s t h i s Court t o quash an o r d e r of t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t t h a t r e v e r s e d t h e j u s t i c e o f t h e peace c o u r t and s e t a m a t t e r concerning v i o l a t i o n o f an ordinance of t h e town of Denton, Fergus County, Montana, f o r t r i a l i n t h e j u s t i c e c o u r t of Lewistown township. This Court a f t e r ex p a r t e a p p l i c a t i o n s e t t h e m a t t e r f o r h e a r i n g and o r a l argument on A p r i l 29, 1975. A f t e r o r a l argument t h e m a t t e r was taken under advisement by t h e Court. R e l a t o r F o r r e s t Goodwin was charged i n j u s t i c e c o u r t , Lewistown Township, Fergus County, Montana by a complaint d a t e d November 12, 1974, w i t h v i o l a t i n g s e c t i o n 4-414, R.C.M. 1947. The complaint a l l e g e s r e l a t o r v i o l a t e d s e c t i o n 4-414 i n terms of an a l l e g e d s a l e of b e e r a f t e r t h e hour of 1:00 a.m., i n controvention of an ordinance of t h e town of Denton, Montana. d el at or's counsel f i l e d , i n t h e j u s t i c e c o u r t , a motion t o d i s m i s s t h e complaint and a memo i n support t h e r e o f , on t h e ground t h a t t h e substance o f t h e s t a t e ' s c a s e was n o t an a l l e g a t i o n o f a v i o l a t i o n of s e c t i o n 4-414, b u t r a t h e r , an a l l e g a t i o n speaking t o a purported v i o l a t i o n of an ordinance o f t h e town of Denton and t h t h e r e f o r e , t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n s t a t u t e s of t h e Revised Codes of Monta c l e a r l y r e q u i r e d t h a t t h e c a s e be brought i n t h e name o f t h e town of Denton and be prosecuted by t h a t town i n i t s p o l i c e c o u r t . David S a t h e r , j u s t i c e of t h e peace of t h e Lewistown town- s h i p , Fergus County, Montana, subsequently ordered t h e complaint on f i l e a g a i n s t r e l a t o r be dismissed on t h e above s t a t e d grounds. T h e r e a f t e r , t h e Fergus county a t t o r n e y appealed j u s t i c e of t h e peace s a t h e r ' s o r d e r t o tk d i s t r i c t c o u r t , Tenth J u d i c i a l D i s t r i c t , county of Fergus, where, a f t e r a h e a r i n g , D i s t r i c t Judgt LeRoy McKinnon r e v e r s e d t h e judgment of t h e j u s t f c e r i i t h e peace and remanded t h e c a s e t o t h e j u s t i c e c o u r t f o r .-rr 1.. 5
The complaint on f i l e c l r l r l y e s t a b l i s h e s t h a t r e l a t o r was chatged v ~ t t l ii v i o l a t i o r l z ri;' ;%i ; ordinance of t h e town of Dentoi Fergus Ca!mty, :.Tort Cana : "That he t h e s a i d FORREST GOODWIN d i d then a n d r h e r e w i l l f u l l y , u n l a w f u l l y and wrongfully s e l l b e e r a t an e s t a b l i s h m e n t l i c e n s e d under t h e Montana Beer Act, a f t e r t h e hour of 1:00 o ' c l o c k A.M., and b e f o r e t h e hour of 8:00 o ' c l o c k P.M. of s a i d day, and c o n t r a r y t o t h e ordinances of t h e Town of Denton, Fergus County, Montana, s o provided; s a i d s a l e was made by an agent of t h e Defendant h e r e i n . " (Emphasis supplied). It i s w e l l e s t a b l i s h e d i n Montana law t h a t p o l i c e c o u r t s a r e c o u r t s of l i m i t e d j u r i s d i c t i o n and have such a u t h o r i t y a s i s e x p r e s s l y c o n f e r r e d upon them. S t a t e v. Tropf, ; Mont . 530 P.2d 1158, 32 St.Rep. 56, 59. S e c t i o n 4-414, R.C.M. 1947, e s t a b l i s h e s t h e c l o s i n g hours f o r l i c e n s e d premises i n t h e s t a t e of Montana a s 2:00 a.m., and provides a u t h o r i t y f o r a c i t y o r tow t o r e s t r i c t f u r t h e r t h e hours w i t h i n t h e c i t y o r town: "*** provided, however, when any c i t y o r i n c o r p o r a t e d o r unincorporated town has any ordinance f u r t h e r r e s t r i c t i n g t h e hours of s a l e of l i q u o r , such r e s t r i c t e d hours s h a l l b e t h e hours d u r i n g which s a l e of l i q u o r a t r e t a i l s h a l l n o t b e permitted w i t h i n t h e j u r i s d i c t i o n o f any such c i t y o r town." (Emphasis supplied). The town of Denton, pursuant t o t h i s g r a n t of a u t h o r i t y , passed an ordinance f u r t h e r r e s t r i c t i n g t h e s a l e of l i q u o r t o 1:00 a.m. S e c t i o n 11-1603, R.C.M. 1947, provides i n p e r t i n e n t p a r t : II J u r i s d i c t i o n f o r v i o l a t i o n of o r d i n a n c e s , and c i v i l and c r i m i n a l j u r i s d i c t i o n . The p o l i c e c o u r t a l s o h a s exclusive jurisdiction : "1. Of a l l proceedings f o r t h e v i o l a t i o n o f any ordinance of t h e c i t y o r town, both c i v i l and c - - m-i - a l . which must be prosecuted i n t h e name of t h e -ri n c i t y o r town ** *.It ( ~ m ~ h a s s u p p l i e d . ) is Here, we have an a l l e g e d v i o l a t i o n of a c i t y ordinance which i s n o t a v i o l a t i o n of t h e s t a t e law; t h e town has t h e a u t h . o r i t y t o o r d a i n on t h e s u b j e c t m a t t e r and has done so. The polil c o u r t i n t h e town of Denton, Montana h a s e x c l u s i v e j u r i s d i c t i o n over t h e m a t t e r . T h e r e f o r e , a w r i t s h a l l i s s u e from t h i s Court d i r e c t i n g t h e d i s t r i c t c o u r t t o quash t h e judgment of t h a t c o u r t which r e v e r s e d t h e j u s t i c e of t h e peace c o u r t and d i r e c t i n g t h a t t h e complaint be dismissed. It i s s o ORDERED.
(. .
Justice
/ /chief Justice
\--83 J u s t i c e s . u
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
State Ex Rel. Goodwin v. Dist. Cour, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-goodwin-v-dist-cour-mont-1975.