State ex rel. Goodwin v. Dishmon
This text of 201 P. 286 (State ex rel. Goodwin v. Dishmon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion:
This case is a search-warrant proceeding, instituted in the district court of Missoula county under the provisions of the Prohibition Enforcement Act (Laws 1917, Chap. 143).' It came before this court on appeal by defendants and claimants from the final judgment rendered by the court, after a hearing upon the return by the sheriff of the warrant declaring forfeited a quantity of whiskey seized thereunder and ordering it destroyed, and an attempted appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
[118]*118The appeal from the order denying the motion is dismissed, for the reason that a motion for a new trial in such proceeding is not authorized. The appeal from the judgment presents the same question as that presented in the cases of State ex rel. Samlin v. District Court of Custer County et al., 59 Mont. 600, 198 Pac. 362, and State ex rel. Hogue v. O’Brien, 60 Mont. 178, 198 Pac. 1117. Upon the authority of these cases, the judgment is reversed, and the district court is directed to dismiss the proceeding, and order the sheriff to return the whiskey and articles seized to the defendants and claimants.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
201 P. 286, 61 Mont. 117, 1921 Mont. LEXIS 16, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-goodwin-v-dishmon-mont-1921.