State Ex Rel. Gonzales v. Lehman, Sheriff

142 So. 649, 106 Fla. 18
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 18, 1932·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It is contended by the plaintiff in error that Section 5413 R. G. S., being a part of chapter 6225 Acts of 1911, repealed the other Section. We can find no basis for this contention. Both of these statutes were adopted as substantive law by the Legislature of the State of Florida in its adoption of the Revised General Statutes of Florida as the statutory law of this State and as both sections have a definite field of service and operatio'n, although they apply to like subjects, there is no such conflict between them as to destroy the force and effect of either.

The judgment should be affirmed and it is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Bueord, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur. *19 Whitfield, P.J., and Terrell and Davis, J.J., concur in the opinion and judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Gonzales v. Lehman, Sheriff, 142 So. 649, 106 Fla. 18 (Fla. 1932).

142 So. 649 (State Ex Rel. Gonzales v. Lehman, Sheriff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.