State ex rel. Goldstine v. Noble Circuit Court

Indiana Supreme Court

State ex rel. Goldstine v. Noble Circuit Court

161 N.E.2d 621, 240 Ind. 693, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 277

CourtIndiana Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 15, 1959

DocketNo. 0-572

StatusPublished

This text of 161 N.E.2d 621 (State ex rel. Goldstine v. Noble Circuit Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Goldstine v. Noble Circuit Court, 161 N.E.2d 621, 240 Ind. 693, 1959 Ind. LEXIS 277 (Ind. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

The petitioner herein has filed what purports to be a petition for a writ of mandamus. He is attempting to mandate the Noble Circuit Court to hear a “Verified Petition To Set Aside and Hold for Naught Void Judgment.”

Supreme Court Rule 2-35, in relation to writs of mandate provides, in part: “If the relief sought relates to a proceeding in an inferior court certified copies of all pleadings, orders and entries pertaining to the subject matter should be set out in the petition or made exhibits thereto.”

Petitioner has not complied with Rule 2-35, as above quoted, nor has he made a good faith effort to comply therewith as provided in State ex rel. Fritz et al. v. Del. C. C., etc. (1957), 236 Ind. 229, 139 N. E. 2d 442; Teeple v. State, ex rel. (1908), 171 Ind. 268, 271, 86 N. E. 49.

Petition denied.

Note. — Reported in 161 N. E. 2d 621.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI