State ex rel. Glover v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Glover v. State

704 So. 2d 242, 1997 La. LEXIS 4105, 1997 WL 803710

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedDecember 19, 1997

DocketNo. 97-KH-1474

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 704 So. 2d 242 (State ex rel. Glover v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Glover v. State, 704 So. 2d 242, 1997 La. LEXIS 4105, 1997 WL 803710 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. Because relator did not raise the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal, see State v. Glover, 93-959 (La.App. 5th Cir. 3/29/94), 636 So.2d 976, and because an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is in most cases better raised in an application for post-conviction relief than on direct review, see, e.g., State v. Peart, 621 So.2d 780, 787 (La.1993), and because this is relator’s first application for post-conviction relief, La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 does not apply. The district court is therefore ordered to consider the merits of relator’s application.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Writ granted in part; otherwise denied; case remanded to the district court. Because relator did not raise the issue of ineffective assistance of counsel on appeal, see State v. Glover, 93-959 (La.App. 5th Cir. 3/29/94), 636 So.2d 976, and because an ineffective assistance of counsel claim is in most cases better raised in an application for post-conviction relief than on direct review, see, e.g., State v. Peart, 621 So.2d 780, 787 (La.1993), and because this is relator’s first application for post-conviction relief, La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 does not apply. The district court is therefore ordered to consider the merits of relator’s application.

VICTORY, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

704 So. 2d 242, 1997 La. LEXIS 4105, 1997 WL 803710, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-glover-v-state-la-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack