State ex rel. Gilliam v. State

788 So. 2d 436, 2001 La. LEXIS 1055, 2001 WL 334723
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Gilliam v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 858 So. 2d 422
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 30, 2001·No. No. 2000-KH-2012·Published

Opinion

In re Gilliam, Ronald; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 383-351; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2000-K-0728.

Writ granted. The district court is or7 dered to appoint counsel and hold a hearing at which it will allow relator to withdraw his guilty plea if he persists in that desire. The record below supports relator’s claim that misinformation with regard to his eligibility for diminution of sentence pursuant to R.S. 15:571.3 (“good time”) precluded him from making his decision to waive trial and enter his pleas “with eyes open.” Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279, 63 S.Ct. 236, 242, 87 L.Ed. 268 (1942); see State ex rel. Aleman v. State, 99-1180 (La.10/1/99), 745 So.2d 602; State ex rel. Brown v. State, 93-1701 (La.3/8/96), 668 So.2d 1148; State v. Scott, 93-0401 (La.3/17/95), 651 So.2d 1344.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Gilliam v. State, 788 So. 2d 436, 2001 La. LEXIS 1055, 2001 WL 334723 (La. 2001).

788 So. 2d 436 (State ex rel. Gilliam v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCann
317 U.S. 269 (Supreme Court, 1943)
State v. Scott
651 So. 2d 1344 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1995)
State Ex Rel. Aleman v. State
745 So. 2d 602 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1999)
Brown v. State
668 So. 2d 1148 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1996)