State ex rel. Gilliam v. State

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State ex rel. Gilliam v. State

788 So. 2d 436, 2001 La. LEXIS 1055, 2001 WL 334723

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedMarch 30, 2001

DocketNo. 2000-KH-2012

StatusPublished

This text of 788 So. 2d 436 (State ex rel. Gilliam v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Gilliam v. State, 788 So. 2d 436, 2001 La. LEXIS 1055, 2001 WL 334723 (La. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Gilliam, Ronald; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 383-351; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2000-K-0728.

Writ granted. The district court is or7 dered to appoint counsel and hold a hearing at which it will allow relator to withdraw his guilty plea if he persists in that desire. The record below supports relator’s claim that misinformation with regard to his eligibility for diminution of sentence pursuant to R.S. 15:571.3 (“good time”) precluded him from making his decision to waive trial and enter his pleas “with eyes open.” Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279, 63 S.Ct. 236, 242, 87 L.Ed. 268 (1942); see State ex rel. Aleman v. State, 99-1180 (La.10/1/99), 745 So.2d 602; State ex rel. Brown v. State, 93-1701 (La.3/8/96), 668 So.2d 1148; State v. Scott, 93-0401 (La.3/17/95), 651 So.2d 1344.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Gilliam, Ronald; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. F, No. 383-351; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2000-K-0728.

Writ granted. The district court is or7 dered to appoint counsel and hold a hearing at which it will allow relator to withdraw his guilty plea if he persists in that desire. The record below supports relator’s claim that misinformation with regard to his eligibility for diminution of sentence pursuant to R.S. 15:571.3 (“good time”) precluded him from making his decision to waive trial and enter his pleas “with eyes open.” Adams v. United States ex rel. McCann, 317 U.S. 269, 279, 63 S.Ct. 236, 242, 87 L.Ed. 268 (1942); see State ex rel. Aleman v. State, 99-1180 (La.10/1/99), 745 So.2d 602; State ex rel. Brown v. State, 93-1701 (La.3/8/96), 668 So.2d 1148; State v. Scott, 93-0401 (La.3/17/95), 651 So.2d 1344.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

788 So. 2d 436, 2001 La. LEXIS 1055, 2001 WL 334723, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gilliam-v-state-la-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack