State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati

Ohio Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati

2009 Ohio 2360, 907 N.E.2d 723, 122 Ohio St. 3d 32

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 27, 2009

Docket2008-0029

StatusPublished

This text of 2009 Ohio 2360 (State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati, 2009 Ohio 2360, 907 N.E.2d 723, 122 Ohio St. 3d 32 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause is before the court upon appellants’ appeal from a judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} On June 12, 2008, we granted appellants’ motion for a partial remand to allow the court of appeals to rule on the motion for relief from judgment that appellants had filed in that court. The court of appeals subsequently granted the motion for relief from judgment and, on March 13, 2009, granted the writ of mandamus sought by appellants. State ex rel. Gilbert v. Cincinnati, Hamilton App. No. C-070166, 2009-Ohio-1078, 2009 WL 636541.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, this cause is dismissed as moot.

*33 Manley Burke, L.P.A., Matthew W. Fellerhoff, and Daniel J. McCarthy, for appellants. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} This cause is before the court upon appellants’ appeal from a judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} On June 12, 2008, we granted appellants’ motion for a partial remand to allow the court of appeals to rule on the motion for relief from judgment that appellants had filed in that court. The court of appeals subsequently granted the motion for relief from judgment and, on March 13, 2009, granted the writ of mandamus sought by appellants. State ex rel. Gilbert v. Cincinnati, Hamilton App. No. C-070166, 2009-Ohio-1078, 2009 WL 636541.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, this cause is dismissed as moot.

*33 Manley Burke, L.P.A., Matthew W. Fellerhoff, and Daniel J. McCarthy, for appellants. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2009 Ohio 2360, 907 N.E.2d 723, 122 Ohio St. 3d 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gilbert-v-city-of-cincinnati-ohio-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack