State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati

2009 Ohio 2360, 907 N.E.2d 723, 122 Ohio St. 3d 32
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 27, 2009·No. 2008-0029·Published

Opinion

{¶ 1} This cause is before the court upon appellants’ appeal from a judgment of the court of appeals denying a writ of mandamus.

{¶ 2} On June 12, 2008, we granted appellants’ motion for a partial remand to allow the court of appeals to rule on the motion for relief from judgment that appellants had filed in that court. The court of appeals subsequently granted the motion for relief from judgment and, on March 13, 2009, granted the writ of mandamus sought by appellants. State ex rel. Gilbert v. Cincinnati, Hamilton App. No. C-070166, 2009-Ohio-1078, 2009 WL 636541.

{¶ 3} Accordingly, this cause is dismissed as moot.

*33 Manley Burke, L.P.A., Matthew W. Fellerhoff, and Daniel J. McCarthy, for appellants. Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati, 2009 Ohio 2360, 907 N.E.2d 723, 122 Ohio St. 3d 32 (Ohio 2009).

2009 Ohio 2360 (State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gilbert v. City of Cincinnati, C-070166 (3-13-2009)
2009 Ohio 1078 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)