State ex rel. Gerstein v. Schwartz
Opinion
Relator, Richard E. Gerstein, State Attorney of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable Alan R. Schwartz, Circuit Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, to perform his legal duty under Section 921.241(1),1 Florida Statutes. An alternative writ was issued, Judge Schwartz responded, the briefs of the parties were filed and the cause is ready for final disposition.
Section 921.241(1), Florida Statutes, requires judges to have the fingerprints of defendants, convicted in their courts of felonies, attached to the written judgment of guilt. The fingerprints must be attached in open court in the presence of the judge. And the judge is to certify that the fingerprints are the felon’s. Judge Schwartz refuses to carry out this duty because he believes the statute is a legislative ihfringement on the judicial branch of government, contrary to our constitutional scheme of separation of powers. The same argument was advanced under the 1885 Constitution against a substantially identical predecessor to the statute in Hearns v. State, 223 So.2d 738 (Fla.1969). The argument was rejected because it is within legislative bounds for the Legislature to confer on the judiciary reasonable duties designed to promote law enforcement, including deterrence to recidivism. Hearns at 739, 740. Nothing has intervened since then which makes the reasoning in Hearns any less forceful when applied to this statute, which has law enforcement,2 too, as part of its purpose.
Judge Schwartz is directed to comply with Section 921.241, Florida Statutes.
It is so ordered.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
357 So. 2d 167 (State ex rel. Gerstein v. Schwartz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.