State ex rel. Gerstein v. Schwartz

357 So. 2d 167, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4728
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 1978
DocketNo. 51780
StatusPublished

This text of 357 So. 2d 167 (State ex rel. Gerstein v. Schwartz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Gerstein v. Schwartz, 357 So. 2d 167, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4728 (Fla. 1978).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Relator, Richard E. Gerstein, State Attorney of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, has petitioned this Court for a writ of mandamus to compel the Honorable Alan R. Schwartz, Circuit Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit, to perform his legal duty under Section 921.241(1),1 Florida Statutes. An alternative writ was issued, Judge Schwartz responded, the briefs of the parties were filed and the cause is ready for final disposition.

Section 921.241(1), Florida Statutes, requires judges to have the fingerprints of defendants, convicted in their courts of felonies, attached to the written judgment of guilt. The fingerprints must be attached in open court in the presence of the judge. And the judge is to certify that the fingerprints are the felon’s. Judge Schwartz refuses to carry out this duty because he believes the statute is a legislative ihfringement on the judicial branch of government, contrary to our constitutional scheme of separation of powers. The same argument was advanced under the 1885 Constitution against a substantially identical predecessor to the statute in Hearns v. State, 223 So.2d 738 (Fla.1969). The argument was rejected because it is within legislative bounds for the Legislature to confer on the judiciary reasonable duties designed to promote law enforcement, including deterrence to recidivism. Hearns at 739, 740. Nothing has intervened since then which makes the reasoning in Hearns any less forceful when applied to this statute, which has law enforcement,2 too, as part of its purpose.

Judge Schwartz is directed to comply with Section 921.241, Florida Statutes.

It is so ordered.

, OVERTON, C. J., and BOYD, ENGLAND, SUNDBERG, HATCHETT and KARL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hearns v. State
223 So. 2d 738 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
357 So. 2d 167, 1978 Fla. LEXIS 4728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gerstein-v-schwartz-fla-1978.