State ex rel. George v. Mount

21 La. Ann. 177
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedMarch 15, 1869
DocketNo. 1963
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 21 La. Ann. 177 (State ex rel. George v. Mount) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. George v. Mount, 21 La. Ann. 177 (La. 1869).

Opinion

Howell, J.

A motion is made by the relators to dismiss this appeal on the ground that no appeal bond has been furnished by the appellant.

In reply it is contended that the city of New Orleans is the real defendant and party in interest,- and is by law exempted from giving an appeal bond.

The proceeding is a mandamus directing the defendant to fulfill a duty required of him by law as Treasurer of the city of New Orleans, by paying certain warrants in favor of and held by the relators, and he has appealed from a judgment making the Writ peremptory. The city, not having been cited through its proper officer; is not a party to the suit. We know of no law authorizing the Treasurer to represent the corporation in a litigation. The exemption in favor of the city, being in derogation of a general law, cannot be extended to other parties, even though they be officers of the corporation.

It is therefore ordered that the appeal herein be dismissed at appellant’s cost.

Rehearing refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Douglas v. Kennedy
46 So. 796 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1908)
State ex rel. Jordan v. Bechtner
113 N.W. 42 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1907)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 La. Ann. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-george-v-mount-la-1869.