State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission

347 N.E.2d 526, 46 Ohio St. 2d 271, 75 Ohio Op. 2d 322, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 630

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedMay 26, 1976

DocketNo. 76-45

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 347 N.E.2d 526 (State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial Commission, 347 N.E.2d 526, 46 Ohio St. 2d 271, 75 Ohio Op. 2d 322, 1976 Ohio LEXIS 630 (Ohio 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appellant contends that “respondent grossly abused its discretion by awarding a percentage of disability in reliance upon medical reports of conditions (a) other than those for which the claim was allowed, (b) not supported by objective evidence of (c) new and changed conditions. ’ ’

However, a review of the record discloses that there is evidence which supports the findings of the Industrial Commission, and, accordingly, this court will not disturb that determination. See State, ex rel. General Motors Corp., v. Indus. Comm. (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 278, 282.

The judgment of the Court of Appeals denying the writ is affirmed. .

Judgment affirmed.

O’Neiml, C. J., Herbert, Corrigan,- Stern.,- Celebrezze, W. Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI