State ex rel. General Accident Group v. Cramer
218 N.E.2d 619, 7 Ohio St. 2d 83, 36 Ohio Op. 2d 62, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 319
Opinion
Appellant insists that by reason of the judgment of this court in Conold v. Stern, 138 Ohio St. 352, it is on the horns of a dilemma. If it steps to its insured’s defense in the tort action, it will not be permitted to impeach his probable testimony that he was the driver.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. General Accident Group v. Cramer, 218 N.E.2d 619, 7 Ohio St. 2d 83, 36 Ohio Op. 2d 62, 1966 Ohio LEXIS 319 (Ohio 1966).
218 N.E.2d 619 (State ex rel. General Accident Group v. Cramer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State ex rel. Cochran v. Quillin
251 N.E.2d 607 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1969)