Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission

State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission

759 N.E.2d 1255, 94 Ohio St. 3d 38
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 9, 2002
DocketNo. 01-1144
StatusPublished

This text of 759 N.E.2d 1255 (State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Gauvey v. Industrial Commission, 759 N.E.2d 1255, 94 Ohio St. 3d 38 (Ohio 2002).

Opinions

The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals.

Lonas, McGonegal & Tsangeos and Terrance J. McGonegal, for appellant. Betty D. Montgomery, Attorney General, and Keith D. Blosser, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee Industrial Commission. Roetzel & Andress, Douglas E. Spiker and Noel C. Shepard, for appellee Handy & Harmon Automotive Group, Inc. Moyer, C.J., Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Douglas, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Gay v. Mihm
626 N.E.2d 666 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
759 N.E.2d 1255, 94 Ohio St. 3d 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gauvey-v-industrial-commission-ohio-2002.