State Ex Rel. Gaunt v. Fousek

Montana Supreme Court

State Ex Rel. Gaunt v. Fousek

8 P.2d 794, 91 Mont. 463, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 46

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 27, 1932

DocketNo. 6,930.

StatusPublished

This text of 8 P.2d 794 (State Ex Rel. Gaunt v. Fousek) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State Ex Rel. Gaunt v. Fousek, 8 P.2d 794, 91 Mont. 463, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 46 (Mo. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN

delivered the opinion of the court.

Relators were convicted of the same conspiracy charge as was Anderson in the companion case numbered 6929, entitled State ex rel. Anderson v. Fousek, ante, p. 448, 8 Pac. (2d) 791, this day decided. The only differences between this case and that are these: Relator Gaunt at the time of the commission of the offense was chief of police, and the judgment imposed against him was $1,000 and costs; relator Goings was a lieutenant of the police force, and was fined $200 and costs; relator Nelson was a member of the police force, and was fined $250 and costs.

*464 The principles of law announced in case No. 6929 control this case, and, on the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Callaway and Associate Justices Galen, Ford and Matthews concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN

delivered the opinion of the court.

Relators were convicted of the same conspiracy charge as was Anderson in the companion case numbered 6929, entitled State ex rel. Anderson v. Fousek, ante, p. 448, 8 Pac. (2d) 791, this day decided. The only differences between this case and that are these: Relator Gaunt at the time of the commission of the offense was chief of police, and the judgment imposed against him was $1,000 and costs; relator Goings was a lieutenant of the police force, and was fined $200 and costs; relator Nelson was a member of the police force, and was fined $250 and costs.

*464 The principles of law announced in case No. 6929 control this case, and, on the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice Callaway and Associate Justices Galen, Ford and Matthews concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

8 P.2d 794, 91 Mont. 463, 1932 Mont. LEXIS 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gaunt-v-fousek-mont-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack