State ex rel. Garrett v. Costine

2017 Ohio 5799, 77 N.E.3d 993, 149 Ohio St. 3d 1470
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 12, 2017
Docket2017-0801
StatusPublished

This text of 2017 Ohio 5799 (State ex rel. Garrett v. Costine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Garrett v. Costine, 2017 Ohio 5799, 77 N.E.3d 993, 149 Ohio St. 3d 1470 (Ohio 2017).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On relator’s motion for stay and motion for leave to amend complaint and respondent’s motion to dismiss. Motion for stay denied, motion for leave to amend complaint denied as moot, and motion to dismiss granted in part as to the complaint for a writ of mandamus.

An alternative writ of prohibition is granted, and the following briefing schedule is set for presentation of evidence and filing of briefs pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. 12.05. The parties shall file any evidence they intend to present within 20 days of the date of the entry; relator shall file a brief within ten days of the filing of the evidence; respondent shall file a brief within 20 days after the filing of relator’s brief; and relator may file a reply brief within seven days after the filing of respondent’s brief.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2017 Ohio 5799, 77 N.E.3d 993, 149 Ohio St. 3d 1470, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-garrett-v-costine-ohio-2017.