State ex rel. Gant v. State

576 So. 2d 517, 1991 La. LEXIS 717, 1991 WL 43337
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided March 28, 1991·No. No. 90-KH-2665·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In re Gant, Cornelious; — Plaintiff(s); Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs; Parish of St. Mary 16th Judicial District Court Div. “A” Number 118-010; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, Number KW90 1839.

Granted. The portion of relator’s sentence which provides for a jail term in the event of default of payment of a fine is vacated. An indigent person may not be incarcerated because he is unable to pay a fine which is part of his sentence. Bearden v. Georgia, 461 U.S. 660, 103 S.Ct. 2064, 76 L.Ed.2d 221 (1983). However, we note that La.C.Cr.P. art. 886 permits the state to enforce collection of the fine in the same manner as a money judgment in a civil case. State v. Conley, 570 So.2d 1161 (La.1990).

HALL, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Gant v. State, 576 So. 2d 517, 1991 La. LEXIS 717, 1991 WL 43337 (La. 1991).

576 So. 2d 517 (State ex rel. Gant v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Vallee
629 So. 2d 1262 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)
State v. Seal
581 So. 2d 735 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1991)