State ex rel. Gambill v. Opperman

948 N.E.2d 961, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1519
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Gambill v. Opperman. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Ohio St. 3d 298
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided June 10, 2011·No. 2010-1907·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus. This cause originated in this court on the filing of a complaint for a writ of mandamus.

Upon consideration of relator’s application for dismissal, it is ordered by the court that the application for dismissal is denied.

Further, the records of this court indicate that the relator has not filed a merit brief, due June 6, 2011, in compliance with the alternative writ issued in this case and the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof, it is ordered by the court that this cause is dismissed with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Gambill v. Opperman, 948 N.E.2d 961, 128 Ohio St. 3d 1519 (Ohio 2011).

948 N.E.2d 961 (State ex rel. Gambill v. Opperman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.