State ex rel. Gallagher v. Williams

Supreme Court of Missouri

State ex rel. Gallagher v. Williams

127 S.W. 59, 227 Mo. 58, 1910 Mo. LEXIS 91

DecidedMarch 30, 1910

StatusPublished

This text of 127 S.W. 59 (State ex rel. Gallagher v. Williams) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Gallagher v. Williams, 127 S.W. 59, 227 Mo. 58, 1910 Mo. LEXIS 91 (Mo. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

WOODSON, J.

This case is the same in all respects with case entitled State of Missouri ex rel. Julius E. Greffet and Rosalie Greffet v. George H. Williams et al., just decided, with the exception that the relators are different, and a different tract of land is sought to be condemned.

The two cases were argued and submitted together. In that case after a very careful consideration of the questions involved, we decided the case in behalf of respondents, quashed the preliminary writ of prohibition, theretofore issued, denied the permanent writ, and dismissed the petition filed therein. The opinion in that case is controlling in this, and both will be handed down at the same time.

We, therefore, quash the preliminary writ of prohibition heretofore issued, deny the permanent writ, and dismiss the petition filed herein.

All concur, except Gantt, J., who dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WOODSON, J.

This case is the same in all respects with case entitled State of Missouri ex rel. Julius E. Greffet and Rosalie Greffet v. George H. Williams et al., just decided, with the exception that the relators are different, and a different tract of land is sought to be condemned.

The two cases were argued and submitted together. In that case after a very careful consideration of the questions involved, we decided the case in behalf of respondents, quashed the preliminary writ of prohibition, theretofore issued, denied the permanent writ, and dismissed the petition filed therein. The opinion in that case is controlling in this, and both will be handed down at the same time.

We, therefore, quash the preliminary writ of prohibition heretofore issued, deny the permanent writ, and dismiss the petition filed herein.

All concur, except Gantt, J., who dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 S.W. 59, 227 Mo. 58, 1910 Mo. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-gallagher-v-williams-mo-1910.