State ex rel. Fulton v. Blackburn

26 Ohio Law. Abs. 381
Ohio Court of Appeals·Decided July 1, 1937·No. No 16006·Published

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT

The governing statute of limitation is §10509-144, GC, and not §§10509-112 and 10509-134, GC, nor §10509-133 GC, the claimed superadded liability having been only contingent and not a provable claim until the assessment was made.

51 Oh Ap page 61 (18 Abs 482) syllabus 1.

Want of plea of the bar of the applicable statute does not preclude its enforcement.

2 Ohio C. C. Reports 140.

We find no error and the judgment will be affirmed at the costs of the defendants [382]*382and the cause remanded for execution. Exceptions may be saved.

GUERNSEY, PJ, CROW and KLINGER, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Fulton v. Blackburn, 26 Ohio Law. Abs. 381 (Ohio Ct. App. 1937).

26 Ohio Law. Abs. 381 (State ex rel. Fulton v. Blackburn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

STATE Ex FULTON v. CRUIKSHANK
199 N.E. 611 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)