State ex rel. Fulton v. Blackburn

26 Ohio Law. Abs. 381
CourtOhio Court of Appeals
DecidedJuly 1, 1937
DocketNo 16006
StatusPublished

This text of 26 Ohio Law. Abs. 381 (State ex rel. Fulton v. Blackburn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Fulton v. Blackburn, 26 Ohio Law. Abs. 381 (Ohio Ct. App. 1937).

Opinion

OPINION

By THE COURT

The governing statute of limitation is §10509-144, GC, and not §§10509-112 and 10509-134, GC, nor §10509-133 GC, the claimed superadded liability having been only contingent and not a provable claim until the assessment was made.

51 Oh Ap page 61 (18 Abs 482) syllabus 1.

Want of plea of the bar of the applicable statute does not preclude its enforcement.

2 Ohio C. C. Reports 140.

We find no error and the judgment will be affirmed at the costs of the defendants [382]*382and the cause remanded for execution. Exceptions may be saved.

GUERNSEY, PJ, CROW and KLINGER, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE Ex FULTON v. CRUIKSHANK
199 N.E. 611 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
26 Ohio Law. Abs. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-fulton-v-blackburn-ohioctapp-1937.