State ex rel. Fulton & Co. v. Colerick

3 Ohio 487
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1828·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

We take the distinction to be, that where the sureties have notice of the suit, and may, or do make defense, the judgment against the principal is conclusive against them. Where such notice is not given, the judgment against the ^principal is prima facie only. It may be impeached for Collusion, or for mistake. But, until so impeached, it is sufficient to entitle the ¡plaintiff to recover the amount for which it is rendered. This court have so ruled in the case of Commissioners of Brown Co. v. Butt, in error, 2 Ohio, 347. And we see no reason to be dissatisfied with the opinion then given. In this case no evidence was offered by the defendants. The motion for a new assessment of damages is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Fulton & Co. v. Colerick, 3 Ohio 487 (Ohio 1828).

3 Ohio 487 (State ex rel. Fulton & Co. v. Colerick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

FirstMerit Bank N.A. v. Inks
2012 Ohio 5155 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2012)
State ex rel. Story v. Jennings
14 Ohio St. (N.S.) 73 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1862)