State ex rel. Fudickar v. Mahaffey

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State ex rel. Fudickar v. Mahaffey

65 So. 2d 392, 1953 La. App. LEXIS 948

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided April 30, 1953·No. No. 7933·Published

Opinion

McINNIS, Judge.

. The. appeal in this case involves the right of Respondent, R. C. Mahaffey, to hold the office of Alderman of the City of West Monróe, -his commission having been issued by the Governor on -July 30, 1952, to fill an unexpired term of more than one year, and presents for review the identical issues considered and disposed of in the case of State ex rel. Fudickar v. Hislop, La.App., 65 So.2d 390. The views therein expressed are controlling here.

For those reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at the cost of respondent in both courts.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McINNIS, Judge.

. The. appeal in this case involves the right of Respondent, R. C. Mahaffey, to hold the office of Alderman of the City of West Monróe, -his commission having been issued by the Governor on -July 30, 1952, to fill an unexpired term of more than one year, and presents for review the identical issues considered and disposed of in the case of State ex rel. Fudickar v. Hislop, La.App., 65 So.2d 390. The views therein expressed are controlling here.

For those reasons, the judgment appealed from is affirmed at the cost of respondent in both courts.

State ex rel. Fudickar v. Mahaffey, 65 So. 2d 392, 1953 La. App. LEXIS 948 (La. Ct. App. 1953).

Pincite

65 So. 2d 392 (State ex rel. Fudickar v. Mahaffey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related