State Ex Rel. Frye v. MacConkey

26 N.E.2d 457, 136 Ohio St. 462, 136 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462, 17 Ohio Op. 31, 1940 Ohio LEXIS 557
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 27, 1940·No. 28043·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

By the Court.

A writ of mandamus will not lie to control judicial discretion. Section 12285, Q-eneral Code.

A writ of prohibition cannot be invoked as a substitute for an appeal and will not be issued to prevent an anticipated erroneous judgment. State, ex rel. Norris, v. Hodapp, Judge, 135 Ohio St., 26, 18 N. E. (2d), 984, and authorities cited therein.

Demurrer to petition sustained and writs denied.

Writs denied.

Weygandt, C. J., Day, Zimmerman, Williams, Myers, Matthias and Hart, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State Ex Rel. Frye v. MacConkey, 26 N.E.2d 457, 136 Ohio St. 462, 136 Ohio St. (N.S.) 462, 17 Ohio Op. 31, 1940 Ohio LEXIS 557 (Ohio 1940).

26 N.E.2d 457 (State Ex Rel. Frye v. MacConkey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State Ex Rel. Mann v. Floyd
34 N.E.2d 196 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1941)