State Ex Rel. Frye v. Conboy, Judge
This text of 53 N.E.2d 543 (State Ex Rel. Frye v. Conboy, Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The relator, an inmate of the Indiana State Prison, filed-a petition for habeas corpus in the respondent court. A writ issued. There was an appearance and a motion to quash the writ, which was sustained. The relator, by this original action, seeks a mandate requiring the respondent court to discharge him from custody. The character of the judgment entered by the trial court upon sustaining the motion to quash is not disclosed. If and when a judgment finally disposing of the matter is entered, there' is a remedy by appeal to question the correctness of the court’s ruling.
No cause for action by this court having been made to appear, the petition is denied.
NoTEi—Reported in 53 N. E. (2d) 543.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 N.E.2d 543, 222 Ind. 293, 1944 Ind. LEXIS 124, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-frye-v-conboy-judge-ind-1944.