State ex rel. Fritchen v. Able Co., Inc.

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Fritchen v. Able Co., Inc.

2000 Ohio 17, 90 Ohio St. 3d 69

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedSeptember 20, 2000

Docket2000-0026

StatusPublished

This text of 2000 Ohio 17 (State ex rel. Fritchen v. Able Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State ex rel. Fritchen v. Able Co., Inc., 2000 Ohio 17, 90 Ohio St. 3d 69 (Ohio 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 69.]

THE STATE EX REL. FRITCHEN, APPELLANT, v. ABLE COMPANY, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Fritchen v. Able Co., Inc., 2000-Ohio-17.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-26—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided September 20, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1611. __________________ Barkan & Neff Co., L.P.A., and Robert E. DeRose, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and issue the requested writ. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 90 Ohio St.3d 69.]

THE STATE EX REL. FRITCHEN, APPELLANT, v. ABLE COMPANY, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES. [Cite as State ex rel. Fritchen v. Able Co., Inc., 2000-Ohio-17.] Workers’ compensation—Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed. (No. 00-26—Submitted July 25, 2000—Decided September 20, 2000.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Franklin County, No. 98AP-1611. __________________ Barkan & Neff Co., L.P.A., and Robert E. DeRose, for appellant. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed consistent with the opinion of the court of appeals. MOYER, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, RESNICK and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., dissent. __________________ ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J., dissenting. {¶ 2} I would reverse the judgment of the court of appeals and issue the requested writ. DOUGLAS and F.E. SWEENEY, JJ., concur in the foregoing dissenting opinion. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2000 Ohio 17, 90 Ohio St. 3d 69, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-fritchen-v-able-co-inc-ohio-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack