State ex rel. Freshwater v. County Board of Education

Ohio Supreme Court

State ex rel. Freshwater v. County Board of Education

128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 123

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided March 28, 1934·No. No. 24546·Published

Opinion

[124]*124This cause came on to be heard upon the petition, answer and reply, and it appearing that no evidence has been offered sustaining the allegation contained in the answer, that Jerome Township Special School District is a centralized rural school district, a writ of mandamus will be allowed as prayed for under the authority of State, ex rel. Snapp, v. Goul, 97 Ohio St., 259, and State, ex rel. Brenner, v. County Board of Education of Franklin County, 97 Ohio St., 336.

Writ allowed.

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[124]*124This cause came on to be heard upon the petition, answer and reply, and it appearing that no evidence has been offered sustaining the allegation contained in the answer, that Jerome Township Special School District is a centralized rural school district, a writ of mandamus will be allowed as prayed for under the authority of State, ex rel. Snapp, v. Goul, 97 Ohio St., 259, and State, ex rel. Brenner, v. County Board of Education of Franklin County, 97 Ohio St., 336.

Writ allowed.

Weygandt, C. J., Allen, Stephenson, Jones, Matthias, Bevis and Zimmerman, JJ., concur.

State ex rel. Freshwater v. County Board of Education, 128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 123 (Ohio 1934).

Pincite

128 Ohio St. (N.S.) 123 (State ex rel. Freshwater v. County Board of Education) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.