State ex rel. Fresh Mark, Inc. v. Mihm
578 N.E.2d 824, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 3738
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Fresh Mark, Inc. v. Mihm. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 Ohio St. 3d 417 →
Opinion
Franklin County, No. 90AP-879. On motion to consolidate with 91-1593, State, ex rel. Fresh Mark, Inc., v. Bowman, Franklin County, No. 90AP-879, and 91-1670, State, ex rel. Fresh Mark, Inc., v. Mihm, Franklin County, No. 90AP-879. Motion granted.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Fresh Mark, Inc. v. Mihm, 578 N.E.2d 824, 62 Ohio St. 3d 1432, 1991 Ohio LEXIS 3738 (Ohio 1991).
578 N.E.2d 824 (State ex rel. Fresh Mark, Inc. v. Mihm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.