State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine
267 N.E.2d 594, 25 Ohio St. 2d 184, 54 Ohio Op. 2d 296, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 549
This text of 267 N.E.2d 594 (State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State ex rel. Freeman v. Valentine, 267 N.E.2d 594, 25 Ohio St. 2d 184, 54 Ohio Op. 2d 296, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 549 (Ohio 1971).
Opinion
Mandamus lies only to compel the performance of an act which is clearly enjoined by law upon a respondent. Here, the respondent did not have possession of the property which relator sought to have returned to him by this action in mandamus.
The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State ex rel. Union Twp. v. Union Twp. Professional Firefighters, IAFF Loc. 3412
2014 Ohio 1582 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State, Ex Rel. Ohio Motorists Assn. v. Masten
456 N.E.2d 567 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1982)
State ex rel. Leis v. Gusweiler
418 N.E.2d 397 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1981)
State ex rel. Sawyer v. O'Connor
377 N.E.2d 494 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1978)
State ex rel. Tulley v. Brown
281 N.E.2d 187 (Ohio Supreme Court, 1972)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
267 N.E.2d 594, 25 Ohio St. 2d 184, 54 Ohio Op. 2d 296, 1971 Ohio LEXIS 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-freeman-v-valentine-ohio-1971.