State ex rel. Frates v. Bishop

117 So. 2d 25
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 7, 1960·No. No. 59-651·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Relator in a suggestion for writ of prohibition appeals from a final judgment discharging the rule nisi and dismissing the suggestion for the writ. He raises questions concerning the legality of his arrest. Since an adequate remedy by appeal exists, no error has been demonstrated.

Affirmed.

HORTON, C. J., and PEARSON and CARROLL, CHAS., JJ-, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Frates v. Bishop, 117 So. 2d 25 (Fla. Ct. App. 1960).

117 So. 2d 25 (State ex rel. Frates v. Bishop) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buchanan v. State ex rel. Morris
167 So. 2d 43 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1964)
State ex rel. Anderson v. Balikes
132 So. 2d 769 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1961)
State ex rel. Colson v. Bishop
117 So. 2d 26 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)