State ex rel. Foster v. Evatt
42 N.E.2d 445, 35 Ohio Law. Abs. 613
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State ex rel. Foster v. Evatt. Read the opinion of the Court — 34 Ohio Law. Abs. 426 →
Opinions
OPINION
We have heretofore determined that the subject matter set up in plaintiff’s second amended petition is not stare decisis by reason of the judgments in State ex Foster v Miller et, 136 Oh St 295, and 137 Oh St 503.
We are satisfied that these judgments do not constitute res adjudicata. Moore v Dunn, 41 Oh St 62. Davis v Arnett (2 Syl.) 25 Abs 402.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State ex rel. Foster v. Evatt, 42 N.E.2d 445, 35 Ohio Law. Abs. 613 (Ohio Ct. App. 1942).
42 N.E.2d 445 (State ex rel. Foster v. Evatt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. Arnett
25 Ohio Law. Abs. 402 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1936)