State ex rel. Fortune v. State

798 So. 2d 953, 2001 La. LEXIS 2944, 2001 WL 1219157
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 5, 2001·No. No. 2001-KH-0080·Published

Opinion

In re Fortune, Larry; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, No. 410-171; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2000-K-1745.

Granted. The district court sentenced relator to five years imprisonment, not five years imprisonment at hard labor. Sentencing tr. at 3. Accordingly, the Court did not commit relator to the custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (“DOC”), and the DOC improperly took relator into custody. R.S. 15:824(C); State v. Lisenby, 534 So.2d 996, 998 (La.App. 3d Cir.1988). The district court is accordingly ordered to ensure relator’s transfer to the custody of parish officials.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State ex rel. Fortune v. State, 798 So. 2d 953, 2001 La. LEXIS 2944, 2001 WL 1219157 (La. 2001).

798 So. 2d 953 (State ex rel. Fortune v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lisenby
534 So. 2d 996 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)