State ex rel. Fortune v. State

798 So. 2d 953, 2001 La. LEXIS 2944, 2001 WL 1219157
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedOctober 5, 2001
DocketNo. 2001-KH-0080
StatusPublished

This text of 798 So. 2d 953 (State ex rel. Fortune v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State ex rel. Fortune v. State, 798 So. 2d 953, 2001 La. LEXIS 2944, 2001 WL 1219157 (La. 2001).

Opinion

In re Fortune, Larry; — Plaintiff; Applying for Supervisory and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court Div. E, No. 410-171; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 2000-K-1745.

Granted. The district court sentenced relator to five years imprisonment, not five years imprisonment at hard labor. Sentencing tr. at 3. Accordingly, the Court did not commit relator to the custody of the Department of Public Safety and Corrections (“DOC”), and the DOC improperly took relator into custody. R.S. 15:824(C); State v. Lisenby, 534 So.2d 996, 998 (La.App. 3d Cir.1988). The district court is accordingly ordered to ensure relator’s transfer to the custody of parish officials.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Lisenby
534 So. 2d 996 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
798 So. 2d 953, 2001 La. LEXIS 2944, 2001 WL 1219157, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-ex-rel-fortune-v-state-la-2001.